Western Michigan
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
113  Hanne Christensen SR 20:00
444  Claire Gilbert SR 20:46
483  Sarah Anderson JR 20:49
1,390  Juliane Sorman FR 21:54
2,227  Brittney Hall SO 22:49
2,612  Rebecca McNamee FR 23:27
2,690  Autumn Lewis SO 23:38
2,705  Courtney Allen FR 23:40
2,797  Emily Fonzi FR 23:54
National Rank #83 of 348
Great Lakes Region Rank #11 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.2%
Top 20 in Regional 98.6%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Hanne Christensen Claire Gilbert Sarah Anderson Juliane Sorman Brittney Hall Rebecca McNamee Autumn Lewis Courtney Allen Emily Fonzi
MSU Spartan Invitational 09/15 1287 20:56 22:41 23:25 23:44 22:51
Joe Piane Invitational (Gold) 09/29 971 20:11 20:37 20:43 22:09 22:55 23:28 23:46
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 980 19:57 20:46 21:05 21:52 22:29 23:27 23:51
Mid-American Championship 10/28 926 19:56 20:43 20:37 21:47 22:43 23:09 22:58 24:06 23:55
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/10 975 19:48 20:48 20:57 21:49 23:14 23:58 23:23





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.6 477 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.7 4.6 7.4 14.1 17.1 18.5 17.8 12.2 4.6 1.2 0.3



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hanne Christensen 44.1% 90.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
Sarah Anderson 0.0% 149.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hanne Christensen 14.7 0.5 1.7 2.6 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.6 4.5 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.4 4.2 4.1 3.5 5.1 4.2 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.1 2.2
Claire Gilbert 61.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4
Sarah Anderson 63.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
Juliane Sorman 138.5
Brittney Hall 196.5
Rebecca McNamee 213.9
Autumn Lewis 219.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.2% 0.2 10
11 0.6% 0.6 11
12 1.7% 1.7 12
13 4.6% 4.6 13
14 7.4% 7.4 14
15 14.1% 14.1 15
16 17.1% 17.1 16
17 18.5% 18.5 17
18 17.8% 17.8 18
19 12.2% 12.2 19
20 4.6% 4.6 20
21 1.2% 1.2 21
22 0.3% 0.3 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0